Theodiscus (in Medieval Latin,
corresponding to Old English þēodisc, Old High German diutisc and other early
Germanic reflexes of Proto-Germanic *þiudiskaz, meaning "popular" or "of the people")
was a term used in the early Middle Ages to refer to the West Germanic languages. The Latin term was borrowed from the Germanic
adjective meaning "of the people" but, unlike it, was used only to refer to languages. In Medieval Western
Europe non-native Latin was the language of science, church and administration, hence Latin theodiscus and its Germanic
counterparts were used as antonyms of Latin, to refer to the "native language spoken by the general populace". They
were subsequently used in the Frankish Empire to denote the native Germanic vernaculars. As such, they were no longer used
as antonym of Latin, but of walhisk, a language descendant from Latin, but nevertheless the speech of the general
populace as well. In doing so Latin theodiscus and the Germanic reflexes of *þiudiskaz effectively
obtained the meaning of "Germanic", or more specifically one of its local varieties – resulting in the English
exonym Dutch, the German endonym Deutsch, the Dutch exonym Duits, and the Dutch endonym Diets,
all of which are cognates of theodiscus, which in Italian yielded tedesco.
Theodiscus is derived from West Germanic *þiudisk, from Proto-Germanic
*þiudiskaz. The stem of this word, *þeudō, meant "people" in Proto-Germanic,
and *-iskaz was an adjective-forming suffix, of which -ish is the Modern English cognate with the same meaning.
The Proto-Indo-European word *tewtéh₂ ("tribe", "people"), which is commonly reconstructed
as the basis of the word, is related to Lithuanian tautà ("nation"), Old Irish túath
("tribe", "people") and Oscan touto ("community").
The word existed in Old English as þēodisc ("speech", "public", 'native"),
came into Middle English as thede ("nation", "people") and was extinct in Early Modern
English, although surviving in the English place name Thetford, "public ford" and in the exonym Dutch.
It survives as the Icelandic word þjóð for "people, nation", the Norwegian word
tjod for "people", "nation", and the word "German" in many languages including
German Deutsch, Dutch Duits, Yiddish דײַטש,
Danish tysk, Norwegian tysk, Swedish tyska and Italian tedesco.
The word theodism, a neologism for a branch of
Germanic neopaganism, is based on the Gothic form of the word, where þiudisko also took on the meaning
of "pagan", a Judeo-Christian calque on similar formations such as "Gentile" from Latin gens
("people") and Hebrew goy, i.e. "belonging to (other) peoples". Proto-Slavic borrowed the word as *ťuďь
with the meaning "foreign" (thus the opposite of the original meaning "native"), giving rise, for example,
to modern Polish cudzy, Czech cizí, Serbo-Croat tuđi and
morphologically similar, the Latin root Teutonic for "Germanic" is more distantly related, and
originally a name of a Celtic or Germanic tribe that inhabited coastal Germany. It came probably via Celtic from Proto-Germanic
*þeudanaz ("ruler", "leader of the people"), from *þeudō
("people, tribe"), from Proto-Indo-European *tewtéh₂ ("people", "tribe").
Semantic development within English
Currently, the first known attestation of theodiscus is to be found in a letter
written around the year 786 by the Bishop of Ostia. In the letter, the bishop writes to Pope Adrian I about a synod taking
place in Corbridge, England; where the decisions were later read aloud elsewhere "tam Latine quam theodisce",
meaning "in Latin as well as the vernacular / common tongue". Rendered in Old English as þēodisc,
the term was primarily used as an adjective concerning the language of the laity. It was rarely used as a descriptor of ethnicity
or identity, as the Anglo-Saxons referred to themselves as Seaxe, Iutas or Engle, respectively
meaning Saxons, Jutes and Angles. The latter term would later give rise to the adjective Englisc, which
during the Early Middle Ages become the term for all speakers of the Germanic dialects now collectively known as Old English.
By the late 14th century, þēodisc had given rise to Middle English duche and its variants, which
were used as a blanket term for all the non-Scandinavian Germanic languages spoken on the European mainland. Historical linguists
have noted that the medieval "Duche" itself most likely shows an external Middle Dutch influence, in that it shows
a voiced alveolar stop rather than the expected voiced dental fricative. This would be a logical result of the Medieval English
wool trade, which brought the English in close linguistic contact with the cloth merchants living in the Dutch-speaking cities
of Bruges and Ghent, who at the time, referred to their language as dietsc. Its exact meaning is dependent on context,
but tends to be vague regardless. When concerning language, the word duche could be used as a hypernym for several
languages (The North est Contrey which lond spekyn all maner Duche tonge — The North [of Europe] is an area, in which
all lands speak all manner of "Dutch" languages) but it could also suggest singular use (In Duche a rudder is a
knyght — In "Dutch" a rudder [cf. Dutch: ridder] is a knight) in which case linguistic and/or geographic
pointers need to be used to determine or approximate what the author would have meant in modern terms, which can be difficult.
For example, in his poem Constantyne, the English chronicler John Hardyng (1378 – 1465) specifically mentions
the inhabitants of three Dutch-speaking fiefdoms (Flanders, Guelders and Brabant) as travel companions, but also lists the
far more general "Dutchemēne" and "Almains", the latter term having an almost equally broad meaning,
though being more restricted in its geographical use; usually referring to people and locaties within modern Germany, Switzerland
He went to Roome with greate power of Britons strong,
with Flemynges and Barbayns, Henauldes,
Gelders, Burgonians, & Frenche,
Dutchemēne, Lubārdes, also many Almains.
He went to Rome with a large number
with Flemings and Brabanters, Hainuyers, Guelders, Burgundians, and Frenchmen,
Lombards, also many Germans.
|—Excerpt from "Constantyne", John Hardyng
|—J. Rivington, The Chronicle of Iohn Hardyng
By early 17th century, general
use of the word Dutch had become exceedingly rare in Great Britain and it became an exonym specifically tied to the modern
Dutch, i.e. the Dutch-speaking inhabitants of the Low Countries. Many factors facilitated this, including close geographic
proximity, trade and military conflicts. Due to the latter, "Dutch" also became pejorative label pinned by English
speakers on almost anything they regard as inferior, irregular, or contrary to their own practice. Examples include "Dutch
treat" (each person paying for himself), "Dutch courage" (boldness inspired by alcohol), "Dutch wife"
(a type of sex doll) and "Double Dutch" (gibberish, nonsense) among others. In the United States, the word "Dutch"
remained somewhat ambiguous until the start of the 19th century. Generally, it referred to the Dutch, their language or the
Dutch Republic, but it was also used as an informal monniker (for example in the works of James Fenimore Cooper and Washington
Irving) for people who would today be considered Germans or German-speaking, most notably the Pennsylvania Dutch. This lingering
ambiguity was most likely caused by close proximity to German-speaking immigrants, who referred to themselves or (in the
case of the Pennsylvania Dutch) their language as "Deutsch" or "Deitsch".
development within Dutch
From Old Dutch
*thiudisk a southern variant duutsc and a western variant dietsc developed in Middle Dutch. In
the earliest sources, its primary use was to differentiate between Germanic and the Romance dialects, as expressed by the
Middle Dutch poet Jan van Boendale, who wrote:
Want tkerstenheit es gedeelt in tween,
die Walsche tongen die
Dandre die Dietsche al geheel
Because Christendom is divided in two parts,
the "Welsh" languages (ie.
Romance languages, compare Walloon) form one,
the other [part] of the whole is "Dutch" (ie. Germanic)
from "Brabantsche Yeesten", by Jan van Boendale (1318)
During the High Middle Ages "Dietsc/Duutsc" was increasingly used as an umbrella
term for the specific Germanic dialects spoken in the Low Countries, its meaning being largely implicitly provided by the
regional orientation of medieval Dutch society: apart from the higher echelons of the clergy and nobility, mobility was
largely static and hence while "Dutch" could by extension also be used in its earlier sense, referring to what
to today would be called Germanic dialects as opposed to Romance dialects, in many cases it was understood or meant to refer
to the language now known as Dutch. Apart from the sparsely populated eastern borderlands, there was little to no contact
with contemporary speakers of German dialects, let alone a concept of the existence of German as language in its modern sense
among the Dutch. Because medieval trade focussed on travel by water and with the most heavily populated areas adjacent to
Northwestern France, the average 15th century Dutchman stood a far greater chance of hearing French or English than a dialect
of the German interior, despite its relative geographical closeness. Medieval Dutch authors had a vague, generalised sense
of common linguistic roots between their language and various German dialects, but no concept of speaking the same language
existed. Instead they saw their linguistic surroundings mostly in terms of small scale regiolects.
The 15th century saw the first attested use of "Nederlandsch" (Dutch: Netherlandish,
Lowlandish) alongside "Duytsch" (the Early Modern spelling of the earlier "Dietsc/Duutsc") as a term
for the Dutch language and it would eventually manifest itself as the main ethnonym. The use of "low(er)" or "nether"
in describing the area now known as the Low Countries has a long historical record. In the 13th century epic the Nibelungenlied,
written in Middle High German, the protagonist Sigurd is said to hail from the city of Xanten in the "Niderlant",
meaning the Rhine delta. In Old French, the inhabitants of the Low Countries were known as the "Avalois", meaning
"those of the [Rhine/Scheldt/Meuse] estuary"; compare contemporary French "en aval" and "à
vau-l'eau" meaning "downstream". The Dukes of Burgundy referred to their Dutch possessions as "pays
d'embas" (French: "lower lands") as opposed to their higher/upper territorial possessions in Burgundy itself,
which was echoed in the Middle and Modern French "Pays-Bas" meaning "Low Countries".
In the second half of the 16th century the neologism "Nederduytsch" (literally:
Nether-Dutch, Low-Dutch) appeared in print, in a way combining the earlier "Duytsch" and "Nederlandsch"
into one compound. The term was preferred by many leading contemporary grammarians such as Balthazar Huydecoper, Arnold
Moonen and Jan ten Kate because it provided a continuity with Middle Dutch ("Duytsch" being the evolution of medieval
"Dietsc"), was at the time considered the proper translation of the Roman Province of Germania Inferior (which
not only encompassed much of the contemporary Dutch-speaking area / Netherlands, but also added classical prestige to the
name) and amplified the dichotomy between Early Modern Dutch and the "Dutch" (German) dialects spoken around the
Middle and Upper Rhine which had begun to be called overlantsch of hoogdutysch (literally: Overlandish,
High-"Dutch") by Dutch merchants sailing upriver. Though "Duytsch" forms part of the compound in both
Nederduytsch and Hoogduytsch, this should not be taken to imply that the Dutch saw their language as being especially closely
related to the German dialects spoken in Southerwestern Germany. On the contrary, the term "Hoogduytsch" specifically
came into being as a special category because Dutch travelers visiting these parts found it hard to understand the local
vernacular: in a letter dated to 1487 a Flemish merchant from Bruges instructs his agent to conduct trade transactions in
Mainz in French, rather than the local tongue to avoid any misunderstandings. In 1571 use of "Nederduytsch" greatly
increased because the Synod of Emden chose the name "Nederduytsch Hervormde Kerk" as the official designation of
the Dutch Reformed Church. The synods choice of "Nederduytsch" over the more dominant "Nederlandsch",
was inspired by the phonological similarities between "neder-" and "nederig" (the latter meaning "humble")
and the fact that it did not contain a worldly element ("land"), whereas "Nederlandsch" did.
As the Dutch increasingly referred to their own language as "Nederlandsch"
or "Nederduytsch", the term "Duytsch" became more ambiguous. Dutch humanists, started to use "Duytsch"
in a sense which would today be called "Germanic", for example in a dialogue recorded in the influential Dutch
grammar book "Twe-spraack vande Nederduitsche letterkunst", published in 1584:
R. ghy zeyde flux
dat de Duytsche taal by haar zelven bestaat/ ick heb my wel laten segghen,
dat onze spraack uyt het Hooghduytsch zou ghesproten zyn.
S: Ick spreeck int ghemeen vande duytse taal, die zelve voor een taal houdende.
R: You've just said that the Dutch
language exists in its own right,
but I've heard it said that our language comes from High Dutch
(ie. German) S: I, like Becanus,
speak of the Germanic language
in general, considering
it as one
|—Excerpt from "Twe-spraack vande Nederduitsche letterkunst", by Hendrik Laurenszoon
Beginning in the second half
16th century, the nomenclature gradually became more fixed, with "Nederlandsch" and "Nederduytsch" becoming
the preferred terms for Dutch and with "Hooghduytsch" referring to the language today called German. Initially
the word "Duytsch" itself remained vague in exact meaning, but after the 1650s a trend emerges in which "Duytsch"
is taken as the shorthand for "Hooghduytsch". This process was probably accelerated by the large number of Germans
employed as agricultural day laborers and mercenary soldiers in the Dutch Republic and the ever increasing popularity of
"Nederlandsch" and "Nederduytsch" over "Duytsch", the use of which had already been in decline
for over a century, thereby acquiring its current meaning (German) in Dutch. While "Nederduytsch" briefly eclipsed
the use of "Nederlandsch" during the 17th century, it always remained a somewhat officious, literary and scholarly
term among the general populace and steadily started to lose ground to "Nederlandsch" in print after 1700. When,
in 1815, the United Kingdom of the Netherlands was proclaimed, it was specifically noted that the official language of the
kingdom was "Nederlandsch" and that the Dutch Reformed Church, as the official State Church, would be known as
the "Nederlandsch Hervormde Kerk" resulting in a profound drop in the already declining use of the word. The Dutch-speaking
Cape Colony came under British control two years prior in 1814, resulting in the continued use of "nederduytsch"
by the Dutch Reformed Church in South Africa in its official nomenclature to the present day. The disappearance of "Nederduytsch",
left "Nederlandsch", first documented in the 15th century, as the sole ethnonym for the Dutch language.
The graph below visualises the decline of "Duytsch" and rise
and decline of "Nederduytsch" as an ethnonym and the eventual dominance of "Nederlands":
In the late
19th century "Nederduits" was reintroduced to Dutch through the German language, where prominent linguists, such
as the Brothers Grimm and Georg Wenker, in the nascent field of German and Germanic studies used the term to refer to Germanic
dialects which had not taken part in the High German consonant shift. Initially this group consisted of Dutch, English, Low
German and Frisian, but in modern scholarship only refers to Low German-varieties. Hence in contemporary Dutch, "Nederduits"
is used to describe Low German varieties, specifically those spoken in Northern Germany as the varieties spoken in the eastern
Netherlands, while related, are referred to as "Nedersaksisch". Likewise in the 19th century, the term "Diets"
was revived by Dutch linguists and historians as a poetic name for Middle Dutch and its literature.
development within German
The second recorded
use of "theodisca" as a reference to a Germanic language was Old High German. In 788, the Annals of the Frankish
Kingdom report the punishment of a Bavarian duke: "quod theodisca lingua herisliz dictum", meaning "known in
the language of the people as herisliz". Herisliz is a German word now obsolete: the "slicing", i.e.
tearing apart of the "Heer" (Desertion). In German dialects, a large amount of forms of "theodiscus" existed
throughout the Middle Ages and which all referred to either the broader Romance/Germanic dichotomy in the West and South or
the Slavic/Germanic bipartition in the East. In Old High German both diutisk and diutisc are known, that
developed in Middle High German as diutsc. In Middle Low German it was known as düdesch and
Modern Low German as dütsch. However, in German, the use of the term referring to Germans specifically
as opposed to people speaking Germanic languages in general evolves during the Early Modern Period and it is in the late
17th and 18th century that the modern meaning of Deutsch is established. In the United States the German
autonym Deutsch would sometimes be rendered as Dutch, due to the perceived similar pronunciation of both
words and also due to the fact that, early on, Dutch was not reserved only for the people of the Netherlands but
for any Germanic speakers from the Continent. A well known example are the Pennsylvania Dutch, who are not of Dutch
descent but originally German immigrants, and speak not Dutch but a German dialect and refer to themselves as Pennsilfaanisch